THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANESHBHAI RUPAJIBHAI KATHUDIYA Advocate - J R JAVRE — 247/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030002882026

e-Filing Number

07-08-2025

Filing Number

247/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

247/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021250561

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANESHBHAI RUPAJIBHAI KATHUDIYA Advocate - J R JAVRE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted Maneshbhai Rupjibhai Kathudia under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 66(1)(B), after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's remorse, his status as a laborer with family responsibilities, and his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sagbara Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted Maneshbhai Rupjibhai Kathudia under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 66(1)(B), after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's remorse, his status as a laborer with family responsibilities, and his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case