THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAHESHBHAI RADATIYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - V R VALVI — 237/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030002782026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

237/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

237/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1182301251423

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI RADATIYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - V R VALVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused Maheshbhai Rastiyabhai Vasava under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code 2023, finding him guilty after he voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering his first offense, poor financial status as a laborer, remorse, and Supreme Court precedents favoring lenient sentencing for economically disadvantaged persons, the court imposed a minimal punishment of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sagbara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused Maheshbhai Rastiyabhai Vasava under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code 2023, finding him guilty after he voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering his first offense, poor financial status as a laborer, remorse, and Supreme Court precedents favoring lenient sentencing for economically disadvantaged persons, the court imposed a minimal punishment of ₹200 fine or 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case