Government of gujarat vs RAJNISHBHAI NARPATBHAI PADVI Advocate - Y R VALVI — 48/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR030000602025
Filing Number
48/2025
Filing Date
08-01-2025
Registration No
48/2025
Registration Date
08-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823021241277
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJNISHBHAI NARPATBHAI PADVI Advocate - Y R VALVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 05-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted defendant Rajnishibhai Narpatbhai Padvi of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (rash/negligent driving without license). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchnama witnesses provided no substantive corroboration and no independent witnesses testified to the alleged rash driving or lack of a valid license. Applying the presumption of innocence principle, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and ordered his acquittal with bail bond cancellation procedures to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted defendant Rajnishibhai Narpatbhai Padvi of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (rash/negligent driving without license). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchnama witnesses provided no substantive corroboration and no independent witnesses testified to the alleged rash driving or lack of a valid license. Applying the presumption of innocence principle, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and ordered his acquittal with bail bond cancellation procedures to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts