Government of gujarat vs RAJNISHBHAI NARPATBHAI PADVI Advocate - Y R VALVI — 48/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR030000602025

Case disposed

Filing Number

48/2025

Filing Date

08-01-2025

Registration No

48/2025

Registration Date

08-01-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11823021241277

Police Station

SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 3,181

Petitioner(s)

Government of gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJNISHBHAI NARPATBHAI PADVI Advocate - Y R VALVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

03-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

05-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted defendant Rajnishibhai Narpatbhai Padvi of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (rash/negligent driving without license). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchnama witnesses provided no substantive corroboration and no independent witnesses testified to the alleged rash driving or lack of a valid license. Applying the presumption of innocence principle, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and ordered his acquittal with bail bond cancellation procedures to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The JMFC Sagbara court acquitted defendant Rajnishibhai Narpatbhai Padvi of charges under IPC Section 281 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3 and 181 (rash/negligent driving without license). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchnama witnesses provided no substantive corroboration and no independent witnesses testified to the alleged rash driving or lack of a valid license. Applying the presumption of innocence principle, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and ordered his acquittal with bail bond cancellation procedures to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAGBARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case