ANITABEN VIKRAMBHAI VASAVA vs DISTRICT DEVELOMENT OFFICER Advocate - S K JOSHI — 221/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,15,. Status: EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJNR020047992023

EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

221/2023

Filing Date

10-11-2023

Registration No

221/2023

Registration Date

10-11-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9,15,

Petitioner(s)

ANITABEN VIKRAMBHAI VASAVA

Adv. K J PANCHAL

SHARDABEN D/O. KHATARBHAI AND W/O. PRAKASHBHAI

Respondent(s)

DISTRICT DEVELOMENT OFFICER Advocate - S K JOSHI

DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER

Adv. S K JOSHI

CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Adv. S K JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

30-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE

07-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE

20-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE

10-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

02-02-2024
ORDER

Case Summary Case: R.C.S. No. 221/2023 | Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajpipla, Gujarat Outcome: The petition seeking interim relief (Vakil-Dar relief - temporary reinstatement) during the pendency of the suit has been DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' prayer to temporarily reinstate them in their posts as Anganwadi workers and teacher while the main dispute is pending, finding their case lacks merit on questions of substantive law and procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: R.C.S. No. 221/2023 | Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajpipla, Gujarat Outcome: The petition seeking interim relief (Vakil-Dar relief - temporary reinstatement) during the pendency of the suit has been DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' prayer to temporarily reinstate them in their posts as Anganwadi workers and teacher while the main dispute is pending, finding their case lacks merit on questions of substantive law and procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case