Shree Ram Transport Co Limited Authorized Officer Mehulkumar Ganpatsinh Raulji vs Ayushbhai Rameshbhai Patel Advocate - B M RAMI — 85/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJNR020020912025

Filing Number

85/2025

Filing Date

16-Jun-2025

Registration No

85/2025

Registration Date

16-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shree Ram Transport Co Limited Authorized Officer Mehulkumar Ganpatsinh Raulji

    Adv. A H PANDYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ayushbhai Rameshbhai Patel Advocate - B M RAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Rajkot Magistrate Court (Case No. 85/2025) dismissed the case against the accused, finding that the video surveillance evidence was obtained in violation of legal procedures under Section 8 of the relevant act. The court held that the defendant's case could not proceed further based on improperly obtained evidence and ordered the dismissal of charges, ruling on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 18-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 16-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajkot Magistrate Court (Case No. 85/2025) dismissed the case against the accused, finding that the video surveillance evidence was obtained in violation of legal procedures under Section 8 of the relevant act. The court held that the defendant's case could not proceed further based on improperly obtained evidence and ordered the dismissal of charges, ruling on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case