ANANDLAL CHANDULAL PARIKH vs NURMOHAMMAD HAJIRASULBHAI SHAIKH Advocate - M G KURISHE — 11/2006

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 009. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJNR020014582006

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

11/2006

Filing Date

07-03-2006

Registration No

11/2006

Registration Date

07-03-2006

Court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 009
SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 038

Petitioner(s)

ANANDLAL CHANDULAL PARIKH

Adv. S K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

NURMOHAMMAD HAJIRASULBHAI SHAIKH Advocate - M G KURISHE

Hearing History

Judge: 7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

05-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

04-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

01-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

30-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

19-03-2024
ORDER

Summary: The court allowed Defendant No. 2's interim appeal and dismissed the plaintiff's claim under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a), finding no sufficient cause for the plaintiff to file the suit. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid reason for the claim regarding the disputed property's sale deed, as the plaintiff had already obtained a decree against Defendant No. 1 and was operating a medical store on the property. Costs of the interim appeal shall follow the main judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Defendant No. 2's interim appeal and dismissed the plaintiff's claim under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a), finding no sufficient cause for the plaintiff to file the suit. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid reason for the claim regarding the disputed property's sale deed, as the plaintiff had already obtained a decree against Defendant No. 1 and was operating a medical store on the property. Costs of the interim appeal shall follow the main judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case