Government of Gujarat vs Sachinbhai Rasikbhai Vasava Advocate - M R VASAVA — 690/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 181,3. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR020008642026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

690/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

690/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

AAMLETHA POLICE STATION - NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 181,3
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachinbhai Rasikbhai Vasava Advocate - M R VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Rajpipla Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 337/338, considering the accused's confession, economic hardship, first-time offense, family dependency, and remorse. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 5 days imprisonment if fine is unpaid), exercising judicial discretion to impose lenient punishment while maintaining justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 690/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajpipla Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 337/338, considering the accused's confession, economic hardship, first-time offense, family dependency, and remorse. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 5 days imprisonment if fine is unpaid), exercising judicial discretion to impose lenient punishment while maintaining justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case