Government of Gujarat vs Govindkumar Keshaji Mina Advocate - M R VASAVA — 689/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR020008632026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

689/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

689/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

168

Police Station

AAMLETHA POLICE STATION - NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Govindkumar Keshaji Mina Advocate - M R VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Rajpipla Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused Govindar Kumar Keshai Minanaom under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, poor socio-economic circumstances, and lack of prior criminal history while imposing a lenient sentence below the standard punishment guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajpipla Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused Govindar Kumar Keshai Minanaom under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with an alternative of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, poor socio-economic circumstances, and lack of prior criminal history while imposing a lenient sentence below the standard punishment guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case