Government of Gujarat vs dipakbhai mukeshbhai vasava Advocate - B M RAMI — 211/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNR020002432026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-01-2026

Filing Number

211/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

211/2026

Registration Date

15-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

1909

Police Station

RAJPIPLA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 181,3

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

dipakbhai mukeshbhai vasava Advocate - B M RAMI

Hearing History

Judge: 7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PLEA

24-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Rajpipla, Narmada district, convicted accused Dipakbhai Mukeshbhai under BNS sections 275 and 281, and IPC sections 3, 181, finding his confession to the charges voluntary and genuine. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering it lenient given his first offense, remorse, poor economic circumstances, and reliance on precedent established in Narotam Hirachand Thakore's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Rajpipla, Narmada district, convicted accused Dipakbhai Mukeshbhai under BNS sections 275 and 281, and IPC sections 3, 181, finding his confession to the charges voluntary and genuine. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering it lenient given his first offense, remorse, poor economic circumstances, and reliance on precedent established in Narotam Hirachand Thakore's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case