Government of Gujarat vs dipakbhai mukeshbhai vasava Advocate - B M RAMI — 211/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR020002432026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2026
Filing Number
211/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
211/2026
Registration Date
15-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT RAJPIPLA
Judge
7-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1909
Police Station
RAJPIPLA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.dipakbhai mukeshbhai vasava Advocate - B M RAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Rajpipla, Narmada district, convicted accused Dipakbhai Mukeshbhai under BNS sections 275 and 281, and IPC sections 3, 181, finding his confession to the charges voluntary and genuine. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering it lenient given his first offense, remorse, poor economic circumstances, and reliance on precedent established in Narotam Hirachand Thakore's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 211/2026
The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Rajpipla, Narmada district, convicted accused Dipakbhai Mukeshbhai under BNS sections 275 and 281, and IPC sections 3, 181, finding his confession to the charges voluntary and genuine. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering it lenient given his first offense, remorse, poor economic circumstances, and reliance on precedent established in Narotam Hirachand Thakore's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts