SATISH ALIAS SATLO GANDO CHANDUBHAI VASAVA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J GOHIL — 97/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJNR010002292026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
97/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
97/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT RAJPIPLA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
2
Police Station
SAGBARA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATISH ALIAS SATLO GANDO CHANDUBHAI VASAVA
Adv. A D ROHIT
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J GOHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Narmada rejected the bail application of Satish alias Satlo Gando Chandubhai Vasava under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court found that the applicant had conscious possession of country-made English liquor worth Rs. 8,17,620/- without permit under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, and cited his extensive criminal history of 35 prior cases, distinguishing him from a co-accused who had no antecedents and was previously granted bail. The court held there is no mandatory rule requiring bail release after charge-sheet filing, and deemed this unfit for bail considering the nature and gravity of offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Narmada rejected the bail application of Satish alias Satlo Gando Chandubhai Vasava under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court found that the applicant had conscious possession of country-made English liquor worth Rs. 8,17,620/- without permit under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, and cited his extensive criminal history of 35 prior cases, distinguishing him from a co-accused who had no antecedents and was previously granted bail. The court held there is no mandatory rule requiring bail release after charge-sheet filing, and deemed this unfit for bail considering the nature and gravity of offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts