SACHINBHAI RAYSINGBHAI PADVI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J GOHIL — 93/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJNR010002222026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

93/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1491

Police Station

RAJPIPLA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),81,116(B)

Petitioner(s)

SACHINBHAI RAYSINGBHAI PADVI

Adv. J S VASAVA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J GOHIL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court granted regular bail to Sachinbhai Raysingbhai Padvi, accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act by allegedly requesting illicit liquor worth Rs. 1,45,400. The court found no conscious possession of the contraband liquor by the applicant and determined that custodial interrogation was unnecessary after investigation completion. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with surety and conditions including monthly police station reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to Sachinbhai Raysingbhai Padvi, accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act by allegedly requesting illicit liquor worth Rs. 1,45,400. The court found no conscious possession of the contraband liquor by the applicant and determined that custodial interrogation was unnecessary after investigation completion. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with surety and conditions including monthly police station reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT RAJPIPLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case