SACHINBHAI RAYSINGBHAI PADVI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J GOHIL — 93/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJNR010002222026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
93/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT RAJPIPLA
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1491
Police Station
RAJPIPLA POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SACHINBHAI RAYSINGBHAI PADVI
Adv. J S VASAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J GOHIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court granted regular bail to Sachinbhai Raysingbhai Padvi, accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act by allegedly requesting illicit liquor worth Rs. 1,45,400. The court found no conscious possession of the contraband liquor by the applicant and determined that custodial interrogation was unnecessary after investigation completion. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with surety and conditions including monthly police station reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2026
The court granted regular bail to Sachinbhai Raysingbhai Padvi, accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act by allegedly requesting illicit liquor worth Rs. 1,45,400. The court found no conscious possession of the contraband liquor by the applicant and determined that custodial interrogation was unnecessary after investigation completion. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with surety and conditions including monthly police station reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts