JAGRUTIBEN UKKADBHAI VASAVA W/O JAY KUMAR VASAVA vs JAY KUMAR RANCHHOBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N P LIMBACHIYA — 19/2026

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29,. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 02nd April 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJNR010002012026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

19/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 Section 29,

Petitioner(s)

JAGRUTIBEN UKKADBHAI VASAVA W/O JAY KUMAR VASAVA

Adv. K J TADVI

Respondent(s)

JAY KUMAR RANCHHOBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N P LIMBACHIYA

RANCHHODBHAI CHUNILAL VASAVA

Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

BHAVNABEN RANCHHODBHAI VASAVA

Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

BHUMIKABEN NIRBHAYBHAI VASAVA

Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

DIPIKABEN JIGNESHBHAI VASAVA

Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

02-04-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
ORDER

The court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, finding that the appellant failed to establish grounds to set aside the arbitral award rendered by the arbitrator. The court held that the arbitrator's decision was valid and enforceable, and the appellant's contentions lacked merit to warrant interference with the arbitral judgment dated April 2, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, finding that the appellant failed to establish grounds to set aside the arbitral award rendered by the arbitrator. The court held that the arbitrator's decision was valid and enforceable, and the appellant's contentions lacked merit to warrant interference with the arbitral judgment dated April 2, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT RAJPIPLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case