JAGRUTIBEN UKKADBHAI VASAVA W/O JAY KUMAR VASAVA vs JAY KUMAR RANCHHOBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N P LIMBACHIYA — 19/2026

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJNR010002012026

Filing Number

19/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT RAJPIPLA

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGRUTIBEN UKKADBHAI VASAVA W/O JAY KUMAR VASAVA

    Adv. K J TADVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAY KUMAR RANCHHOBHAI VASAVA Advocate - N P LIMBACHIYA

  2. 2.RANCHHODBHAI CHUNILAL VASAVA

    Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

  3. 3.BHAVNABEN RANCHHODBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

  4. 4.BHUMIKABEN NIRBHAYBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

  5. 5.DIPIKABEN JIGNESHBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. N P LIMBACHIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, finding that the appellant failed to establish grounds to set aside the arbitral award rendered by the arbitrator. The court held that the arbitrator's decision was valid and enforceable, and the appellant's contentions lacked merit to warrant interference with the arbitral judgment dated April 2, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, finding that the appellant failed to establish grounds to set aside the arbitral award rendered by the arbitrator. The court held that the arbitrator's decision was valid and enforceable, and the appellant's contentions lacked merit to warrant interference with the arbitral judgment dated April 2, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case