RAJESHBHAI MANJIBHAI PARMAR 4,40,892 vs NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR 4,40,892 Advocate - V G VYAS — 1222/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060016032019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1222/2019
Filing Date
27-12-2019
Registration No
1222/2019
Registration Date
27-12-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESHBHAI MANJIBHAI PARMAR 4,40,892
Adv. L G SONAGRA
Respondent(s)
NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR 4,40,892 Advocate - V G VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused (Navinchandra Rajchandra Daskhani) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing cheques that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant provided bills totaling ₹4,40,882 and three post-dated cheques which bounced. The court found the accused guilty of cheating and sentenced him to one year imprisonment, a fine of ₹4,40,882 (twice the cheque amount), and additional compensation of ₹4,40,892 with interest payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused (Navinchandra Rajchandra Daskhani) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing cheques that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant provided bills totaling ₹4,40,882 and three post-dated cheques which bounced. The court found the accused guilty of cheating and sentenced him to one year imprisonment, a fine of ₹4,40,882 (twice the cheque amount), and additional compensation of ₹4,40,892 with interest payable to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts