BHUPATBHAI AAVDDAN GADHAVI 2,32,948 vs NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR Advocate - V G VYAS — 1221/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060016022019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1221/2019
Filing Date
27-12-2019
Registration No
1221/2019
Registration Date
27-12-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHUPATBHAI AAVDDAN GADHAVI 2,32,948
Adv. L G SONAGRA
Respondent(s)
NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR Advocate - V G VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (Section 138) for dishonoring two cheques totaling ₹2,32,848/-. The accused had issued cheques as payment for agricultural goods purchased on credit but failed to maintain sufficient funds, causing the cheques to be returned "Funds Insufficient." Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused did not pay the amount within 15 days, constituting the offense. The court sentenced the accused to one year rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹2,32,848/- as compensation to the complainant, along with the option of additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (Section 138) for dishonoring two cheques totaling ₹2,32,848/-. The accused had issued cheques as payment for agricultural goods purchased on credit but failed to maintain sufficient funds, causing the cheques to be returned "Funds Insufficient." Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused did not pay the amount within 15 days, constituting the offense. The court sentenced the accused to one year rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹2,32,848/- as compensation to the complainant, along with the option of additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts