MAHESHBHAI GOVINDBHAI PATEL 1,88,664 vs NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR Advocate - V G VYAS — 1219/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR060016002019

Case disposedSub Stage

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1219/2019

Filing Date

27-12-2019

Registration No

1219/2019

Registration Date

27-12-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

MAHESHBHAI GOVINDBHAI PATEL 1,88,664

Adv. L G SONAGRA

Respondent(s)

NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR Advocate - V G VYAS

Hearing History

Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

07-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

30-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

17-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT
07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Judgment Summary The court convicted the accused Navinchandra Rajchandra Dakshini under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing cheques (totaling ₹1,88,664) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused had provided three post-dated cheques to settle a debt for agricultural commodities but failed to ensure adequate funds in the account, causing the cheques to be dishonored. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹1,88,664 with compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

05-08-2025
ORDER
03-03-2026
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Judgment Summary The court convicted the accused Navinchandra Rajchandra Dakshini under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing cheques (totaling ₹1,88,664) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused had provided three post-dated cheques to settle a debt for agricultural commodities but failed to ensure adequate funds in the account, causing the cheques to be dishonored. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹1,88,664 with compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case