PRABHATBHAI TAKARSHIBHAI KANJARIYA 2,98,823 vs NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR Advocate - V G VYAS — 1218/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060015992019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1218/2019
Filing Date
27-12-2019
Registration No
1218/2019
Registration Date
27-12-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRABHATBHAI TAKARSHIBHAI KANJARIYA 2,98,823
Adv. L G SONAGRA
Respondent(s)
NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAKSHINI TAKKAR Advocate - V G VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Section 138) for issuing four cheques totaling Rs. 2,98,823 that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to make payment within 15 days of receiving notice. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and ordered him to pay the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant, with further provisions for recovery from his property if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Section 138) for issuing four cheques totaling Rs. 2,98,823 that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to make payment within 15 days of receiving notice. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and ordered him to pay the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant, with further provisions for recovery from his property if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts