KANTILAL RANCHHODBHAI PARMAR 2,84,823 vs NAVINCHAND RAYCHAND DAKSHINI Advocate - V G VYAS — 407/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060014992018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
407/2018
Filing Date
24-08-2018
Registration No
407/2018
Registration Date
24-08-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANTILAL RANCHHODBHAI PARMAR 2,84,823
Adv. D R RAVAL
Respondent(s)
NAVINCHAND RAYCHAND DAKSHINI Advocate - V G VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Halwad, convicted the accused Navinchandra Raysinh Daksini under the Negotiable Instrument (NI) Act 1881, Section 138, for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹2,84,823 with an additional compensatory fine of the same amount payable to the complainant. The accused failed to respond to the legal notice issued after the cheque dishonour, thereby committing the offence under the NI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Halwad, convicted the accused Navinchandra Raysinh Daksini under the Negotiable Instrument (NI) Act 1881, Section 138, for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹2,84,823 with an additional compensatory fine of the same amount payable to the complainant. The accused failed to respond to the legal notice issued after the cheque dishonour, thereby committing the offence under the NI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts