KANTILAL RANCHHODBHAI PARMAR 4,36,843 vs NAVINCHAND RAYCHAND DAKSHINI Advocate - V G VYAS — 406/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060014982018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
406/2018
Filing Date
24-08-2018
Registration No
406/2018
Registration Date
24-08-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANTILAL RANCHHODBHAI PARMAR 4,36,843
Adv. D R RAVAL
Respondent(s)
NAVINCHAND RAYCHAND DAKSHINI Advocate - V G VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the defendant Navinchand Raychand Dakshin (a trading company proprietor) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for dishonoring a check worth ₹4,36,843 issued to the complainant. The court found that the defendant issued the check for payment of a debt, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the bank account, and despite receiving a legal notice, failed to make payment within the stipulated 15-day period, thereby committing the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the defendant Navinchand Raychand Dakshin (a trading company proprietor) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for dishonoring a check worth ₹4,36,843 issued to the complainant. The court found that the defendant issued the check for payment of a debt, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the bank account, and despite receiving a legal notice, failed to make payment within the stipulated 15-day period, thereby committing the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts