RAJENDRASINH VAJUBHA PARMAR 42,599 vs NAVINCHAND RAYCHAND DAKSHINI Advocate - V G VYAS — 394/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060014942018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
394/2018
Filing Date
24-08-2018
Registration No
394/2018
Registration Date
24-08-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRASINH VAJUBHA PARMAR 42,599
Adv. D R RAVAL
Respondent(s)
NAVINCHAND RAYCHAND DAKSHINI Advocate - V G VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a dishonored check. The complainant purchased goods worth ₹42,599 on credit and received a post-dated check that bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused failed to make payment within 15 days, satisfying all statutory requirements for conviction under Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a dishonored check. The complainant purchased goods worth ₹42,599 on credit and received a post-dated check that bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused failed to make payment within 15 days, satisfying all statutory requirements for conviction under Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts