MANSUKHBHAI OGHADBHAI PRAJAPATI 1,33, 891 vs NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAXINI Advocate - V G VYAS — 197/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060012362018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
197/2018
Filing Date
26-06-2018
Registration No
197/2018
Registration Date
26-06-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANSUKHBHAI OGHADBHAI PRAJAPATI 1,33, 891
Adv. R J ZALA
Respondent(s)
NAVINCHANDRA RAYCHANDBHAI DAXINI Advocate - V G VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused Nvinchandra Raychand Dakshini under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing two cheques that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had provided goods to the accused on credit, delivered two cheques as payment, and when the cheques were presented to the bank within the prescribed period, they were rejected for insufficient balance. Despite receiving notice of dishonor, the accused failed to make payment within 15 days, satisfying all elements required under Section 138 of the Act. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 2,01,502, with additional compensation and revenue recovery provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused Nvinchandra Raychand Dakshini under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing two cheques that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant had provided goods to the accused on credit, delivered two cheques as payment, and when the cheques were presented to the bank within the prescribed period, they were rejected for insufficient balance. Despite receiving notice of dishonor, the accused failed to make payment within 15 days, satisfying all elements required under Section 138 of the Act. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 2,01,502, with additional compensation and revenue recovery provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts