ASHOKBHAI VRUJLAL KORADIA 2,57,500 vs JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - K K ADESARA — 170/2018

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR060011992018

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

170/2018

Filing Date

24-05-2018

Registration No

170/2018

Registration Date

24-05-2018

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

ASHOKBHAI VRUJLAL KORADIA 2,57,500

Adv. M M VAGHELA

Respondent(s)

JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - K K ADESARA

Hearing History

Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

28-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

27-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

20-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

06-04-2026

For Arguement of Asscused

Interim Orders

08-01-2019
JUDEGEMENT
13-04-2026
ORDER

Summary Case No. C.C.NO.170-2018 | Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Halwad The petition filed by the accused was dismissed. The court rejected the accused's plea to stay proceedings under Section 36 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that since this is a criminal case under Section 138 NI Act (cheque dishonor), individual criminal procedure applies—not the banking system moratorium provisions. The accused's interim moratorium order was found inapplicable, and the criminal proceedings are to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case No. C.C.NO.170-2018 | Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Halwad The petition filed by the accused was dismissed. The court rejected the accused's plea to stay proceedings under Section 36 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that since this is a criminal case under Section 138 NI Act (cheque dishonor), individual criminal procedure applies—not the banking system moratorium provisions. The accused's interim moratorium order was found inapplicable, and the criminal proceedings are to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case