MAGANBHAI KARSHANBHAI PATEL 2,41,000 vs JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - D K RAJDEV — 169/2018

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR060011982018

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

169/2018

Filing Date

24-05-2018

Registration No

169/2018

Registration Date

24-05-2018

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

MAGANBHAI KARSHANBHAI PATEL 2,41,000

Adv. M M VAGHELA

Respondent(s)

JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - D K RAJDEV

Hearing History

Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

28-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

27-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

20-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE

Interim Orders

15-04-2019
JUDEGEMENT
13-04-2026
ORDER

Summary Case No. C.C.NO.169-2018 | Halwad Additional District Court The court rejected the applicant's petition challenging interim moratorium imposed under Section 38 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The court held that since the case involves an interim moratorium—a civil proceeding under a special statute—the applicant cannot be granted individual proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as that section applies only to criminal matters. The petition was accordingly dismissed on April 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case No. C.C.NO.169-2018 | Halwad Additional District Court The court rejected the applicant's petition challenging interim moratorium imposed under Section 38 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The court held that since the case involves an interim moratorium—a civil proceeding under a special statute—the applicant cannot be granted individual proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as that section applies only to criminal matters. The petition was accordingly dismissed on April 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case