BHARAT VISANJIBHAI PATEL 2,62,500 vs JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - K K ADESARA — 166/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060011952018
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
166/2018
Filing Date
24-05-2018
Registration No
166/2018
Registration Date
24-05-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHARAT VISANJIBHAI PATEL 2,62,500
Adv. M M VAGHELA
Respondent(s)
JAYANTIBHAI R. PATEL Advocate - K K ADESARA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 28-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - C.C.NO.166-2018 Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's plea to have all debt-related cases stayed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as the interim moratorium period had expired. The court upheld that proceedings under Section 138 are criminal in nature and must continue, as they serve to maintain confidence in banking transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - C.C.NO.166-2018 Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's plea to have all debt-related cases stayed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as the interim moratorium period had expired. The court upheld that proceedings under Section 138 are criminal in nature and must continue, as they serve to maintain confidence in banking transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts