HARJIVANBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH KHAS JAMIN SAMPADAN ADHIKARI NARMADA YOJANA DHRANGADHRA 1 Advocate - DGP — 719/2018
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018,. Status: EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJMR060009292018
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
719/2018
Filing Date
30-07-2015
Registration No
719/2018
Registration Date
30-07-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARJIVANBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL
Adv. N.R.PATEL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH KHAS JAMIN SAMPADAN ADHIKARI NARMADA YOJANA DHRANGADHRA 1 Advocate - DGP
KARYAPALAK IJNER SHAURASHTRA SHAKA NAHER VIBHAG 5/1 DHRANGADHRA
Adv. S.J.PANDYA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Interim Orders
The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding land compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, finding that the petitioner failed to substantiate their arguments with proper evidence and that the compensation awarded by the government was appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding land compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, finding that the petitioner failed to substantiate their arguments with proper evidence and that the compensation awarded by the government was appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts