RAJESHBHAI DAYABHAI SONAGRA 14,00,000 vs BHARAT PRABHUBHAI SONAGRA Advocate - P D THAKAR — 665/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060009232022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
665/2022
Filing Date
22-07-2022
Registration No
665/2022
Registration Date
22-07-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESHBHAI DAYABHAI SONAGRA 14,00,000
Adv. D H PANDYA
Respondent(s)
BHARAT PRABHUBHAI SONAGRA Advocate - P D THAKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the complainant's petition to re-open evidence at the final arguments stage in this cheque bounce case (CC 665-2022). The complainant sought to correct a discrepancy in the bank's return memo, which showed ₹1,40,000 instead of ₹14,00,000 (the actual cheque amount), claiming it was a typographical error. The court permitted the reopening of the case in the interest of justice, directing the complainant to pay ₹5,000 as costs to the accused and to proceed expeditiously with the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the complainant's petition to re-open evidence at the final arguments stage in this cheque bounce case (CC 665-2022). The complainant sought to correct a discrepancy in the bank's return memo, which showed ₹1,40,000 instead of ₹14,00,000 (the actual cheque amount), claiming it was a typographical error. The court permitted the reopening of the case in the interest of justice, directing the complainant to pay ₹5,000 as costs to the accused and to proceed expeditiously with the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts