RAMESHBHAI MULJIBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH KHAS JAMIN SAMPADAN ADHIKARI NARMADA YOJANA EKAM 19 SURENDRANGAR Advocate - DGP — 580/2018
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018,. Status: EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJMR060007902018
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
580/2018
Filing Date
22-04-2016
Registration No
580/2018
Registration Date
22-04-2016
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESHBHAI MULJIBHAI PATEL
Adv. N.R.PATEL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH KHAS JAMIN SAMPADAN ADHIKARI NARMADA YOJANA EKAM 19 SURENDRANGAR Advocate - DGP
KARYAPALAK IJNER SHAURASHTRA SHAKA NAHER VIBHAG
Adv. M.P.KARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Interim Orders
Summary: This Land Acquisition Review (LAR 580/2018) petition has been dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for additional compensation for land acquired by the government 20 years prior, finding that the petitioner failed to provide proper documentary evidence supporting the claimed land value and lacked substantiation for the alleged incorrect compensation already received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This Land Acquisition Review (LAR 580/2018) petition has been dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for additional compensation for land acquired by the government 20 years prior, finding that the petitioner failed to provide proper documentary evidence supporting the claimed land value and lacked substantiation for the alleged incorrect compensation already received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts