STATE OF GUJARAT vs SAVAJIBHAI KANTIBHAI DEVIPUJAK — 370/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(3). Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060005032026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
370/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
370/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
1195
Police Station
HALVAD POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SAVAJIBHAI KANTIBHAI DEVIPUJAK
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a police panchnama (witness document) and arrest, finding that the panchnama was properly constituted with the petitioner's signature as witness, and that the police lawfully arrested the accused and seized contraband during the specified time period. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments that they were unaware of the panchnama's contents and did not recognize the accused, upholding the validity of the police procedures and denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a police panchnama (witness document) and arrest, finding that the panchnama was properly constituted with the petitioner's signature as witness, and that the police lawfully arrested the accused and seized contraband during the specified time period. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments that they were unaware of the panchnama's contents and did not recognize the accused, upholding the validity of the police procedures and denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts