STATE OF GUJARAT vs SAVAJIBHAI KANTIBHAI DEVIPUJAK — 370/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(3). Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR060005032026

Filing Number

370/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

370/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1195

Police Station

HALVAD POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAVAJIBHAI KANTIBHAI DEVIPUJAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Judegement

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Order

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a police panchnama (witness document) and arrest, finding that the panchnama was properly constituted with the petitioner's signature as witness, and that the police lawfully arrested the accused and seized contraband during the specified time period. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments that they were unaware of the panchnama's contents and did not recognize the accused, upholding the validity of the police procedures and denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 370/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a police panchnama (witness document) and arrest, finding that the panchnama was properly constituted with the petitioner's signature as witness, and that the police lawfully arrested the accused and seized contraband during the specified time period. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments that they were unaware of the panchnama's contents and did not recognize the accused, upholding the validity of the police procedures and denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case