M.R.SURANI ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER MORBI vs JAYDIP MANSUKHBHAI VIDJA Advocate - N U SOLANKI — 218/2025
Case under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 22,18. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060003492025
Filing Number
218/2025
Filing Date
15-Mar-2025
Registration No
218/2025
Registration Date
15-Mar-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.R.SURANI ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER MORBI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYDIP MANSUKHBHAI VIDJA Advocate - N U SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petitioner's case, finding that the allegations against the respondents under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 lacked sufficient evidence and merit. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and that the respondents' conduct did not constitute the alleged offenses, consequently quashing the proceedings initiated against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
09-Feb-2026
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
13-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
08-Aug-2025
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
27-Jun-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
09-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
05-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 218/2025
The court dismissed the petitioner's case, finding that the allegations against the respondents under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 lacked sufficient evidence and merit. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and that the respondents' conduct did not constitute the alleged offenses, consequently quashing the proceedings initiated against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts