Devjibhai Chaganbhai Koli vs Ghanshyambhai Karshanbhai Rajput Advocate - M N RATHOD — 10/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,38,39,. Status: REPLY. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMR060003002026

REPLY

Next Hearing

11th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 34,38,39,

Petitioner(s)

Devjibhai Chaganbhai Koli

Adv. J V JANI

NAVAGHANBHAI CHAGANBHAI

KAMLESHBHAI CHAGANBHAI

Respondent(s)

Ghanshyambhai Karshanbhai Rajput Advocate - M N RATHOD

BHAVANBHAI BECHARBHAI

Adv. M N RATHOD

VANRAJBHAI BANESHANGBHAI

Adv. M N RATHOD

Jaypalbhai Baneshang rajput

Adv. M N RATHOD

OGHADBHAI PACHANBHAI RAJPUT

Adv. M N RATHOD

DILIPBHAI MERABHAI RAJPUT

Adv. M N RATHOD

MAHESHBHAI MAHADEVBHAI PATEL

Adv. M N RATHOD

SAMUBEN BHAGVANBHAI PARMAR

Adv. M N RATHOD

Dhirubhai Virambhai Chauhan

Adv. M N RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

20-04-2026

REPLY

09-04-2026

REPLY

04-04-2026

REPLY

30-03-2026

REPLY

27-03-2026

REPLY

Interim Orders

23-03-2026
ORDER

Summary: The application for local investigation of disputed agricultural land in Ratabhe village, Halvad district, Morbi is allowed. The District Inspector Land Record, Halvad is appointed as court commissioner to record a panchnama of the current situation and draw a detailed map showing the exact location of the three disputed revenue survey plots. The plaintiff must deposit Rs. 10,000 as commissioner fees, and the commissioner's report is due by March 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for local investigation of disputed agricultural land in Ratabhe village, Halvad district, Morbi is allowed. The District Inspector Land Record, Halvad is appointed as court commissioner to record a panchnama of the current situation and draw a detailed map showing the exact location of the three disputed revenue survey plots. The plaintiff must deposit Rs. 10,000 as commissioner fees, and the commissioner's report is due by March 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case