DALVADI KANCHANBEN NAGARJIBHAI vs SAMJUBEN RAMABHAI VAGHRI Advocate - P A MAKASANA — 67/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,37,. Status: WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMR060001812022

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

67/2022

Filing Date

11-03-2022

Registration No

67/2022

Registration Date

11-03-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 31,34,37,

Petitioner(s)

DALVADI KANCHANBEN NAGARJIBHAI

Adv. P D THAKAR

Respondent(s)

SAMJUBEN RAMABHAI VAGHRI Advocate - P A MAKASANA

SHARDABEN HARKHABHAI VAGHRI

Adv. P A MAKASANA

MANJUBEN HARKHABHAI VAGHRI

Adv. P A MAKASANA

KANTIBHAI ISHVARBHAI PATEL

PARSHOTAMBHAI HIRJIBHAI KAILA

Adv. K M GARCHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

30-04-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

27-03-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

10-03-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

19-02-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

15-01-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
ORDER

Summary RCS No. 67/2022 - Two Substitution Applications Allowed The court allowed two applications for substitution of parties under Order XXII of the CPC, 1908. First, the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff (who died on 19.03.2023) were substituted in the suit. Second, the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.4 (who died on 05.03.2023) were substituted. Both applications were allowed in the interest of justice, and parties were directed to amend the cause title and file amended pleadings within the prescribed time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary RCS No. 67/2022 - Two Substitution Applications Allowed The court allowed two applications for substitution of parties under Order XXII of the CPC, 1908. First, the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff (who died on 19.03.2023) were substituted in the suit. Second, the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.4 (who died on 05.03.2023) were substituted. Both applications were allowed in the interest of justice, and parties were directed to amend the cause title and file amended pleadings within the prescribed time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case