Government of Gujarat vs BHARAT URFE KALU KARMANBHAI AAHIR Advocate - B D GANESHIYA — 60/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,354,5062,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060001752017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
60/2017
Filing Date
08-03-2017
Registration No
60/2017
Registration Date
08-03-2017
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
HALVAD POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHARAT URFE KALU KARMANBHAI AAHIR Advocate - B D GANESHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Halvad acquitted the accused (Bharat Uday Kalu Karman Bhay Uday Babu Bhai Ahir) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 354, 504, 506(2), and 135 IPC in a case involving alleged assault and intimidation of a woman and child on August 15, 2015. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony contradicted itself and lacked consistency with corroborating evidence, and the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Halvad acquitted the accused (Bharat Uday Kalu Karman Bhay Uday Babu Bhai Ahir) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 354, 504, 506(2), and 135 IPC in a case involving alleged assault and intimidation of a woman and child on August 15, 2015. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony contradicted itself and lacked consistency with corroborating evidence, and the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts