Government of Gujarat vs LALAJIBHAI GANGARAMBHAI KOLI Advocate - ABATED — 68/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,325,324,323,504,506.2,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR060000792017

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

68/2017

Filing Date

08-03-2017

Registration No

68/2017

Registration Date

08-03-2017

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD

Judge

33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

149

Police Station

HALVAD POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 326,325,324,323,504,506.2,114,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

LALAJIBHAI GANGARAMBHAI KOLI Advocate - ABATED

THAKARSHIBHAI LALJIBHAI KOLI

Adv. B D GANESHIYA

CHUNIBHAI BHURABHAI KOLI

Adv. B D GANESHIYA

MAHIPATBHAI BHURABHAI KOLI

Adv. B D GANESHIYA

SHANJAYBHAI DEVJIBHAI KOLI

Adv. B D GANESHIYA

DHIRUBHAI DEVJIBHAI KOLI

Adv. B D GANESHIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

20-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

17-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted all six accused persons of the charges against them. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While witness testimonies and medical evidence established that a person named Ozlifad was attacked and injured by multiple individuals on November 18, 2015, the prosecution could not conclusively establish the individual roles and criminal intent of each accused. The contradictions and gaps in witness statements, combined with the lack of corroborating evidence linking specific accused to specific injuries, resulted in reasonable doubt regarding their guilt under IPC sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 504, and 506(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all six accused persons of the charges against them. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While witness testimonies and medical evidence established that a person named Ozlifad was attacked and injured by multiple individuals on November 18, 2015, the prosecution could not conclusively establish the individual roles and criminal intent of each accused. The contradictions and gaps in witness statements, combined with the lack of corroborating evidence linking specific accused to specific injuries, resulted in reasonable doubt regarding their guilt under IPC sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 504, and 506(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case