HARESHBHARTHI BABUBHARTHI GAUSWAMI vs AARTIBA HARISCHANDRASINH URFE HARDIPSINH LAKSHMANSINH JADEJA Advocate - R B PANDYA — 15/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,37,. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMR060000572024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
18-01-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
18-01-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARESHBHARTHI BABUBHARTHI GAUSWAMI
Adv. A V BHATT
Respondent(s)
AARTIBA HARISCHANDRASINH URFE HARDIPSINH LAKSHMANSINH JADEJA Advocate - R B PANDYA
RAJA URFE HARISHCHANDRASINH URFE HARDIPSINH LAKSHMANSINH JADEJA
LAKHDHIRSINH LAKSHMANSINH JADEJA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 15-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 11-12-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 06-11-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted the application filed under Order-I, Rule-10 of the CPC and allowed four parties—Bhavik Gopalbhai Surani, Mit Jagdishbhai Chhaniyara, Dharmadip Rameshbhai Oganja, and Kamleshbhai Ravjibhai Patel—to be joined as defendants (nos. 4, 5, 6, and 7) in the suit. These parties received sale deeds from the original Defendant No. 1 during the pendency of the suit and were found to be necessary parties to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and enable complete adjudication of the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the application filed under Order-I, Rule-10 of the CPC and allowed four parties—Bhavik Gopalbhai Surani, Mit Jagdishbhai Chhaniyara, Dharmadip Rameshbhai Oganja, and Kamleshbhai Ravjibhai Patel—to be joined as defendants (nos. 4, 5, 6, and 7) in the suit. These parties received sale deeds from the original Defendant No. 1 during the pendency of the suit and were found to be necessary parties to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and enable complete adjudication of the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts