MINESH KISHORBHAI SHAH vs DIPEN JAGDISHBHAI THAKKAR Advocate - Y N MEHTA — 13/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 17th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR060000172020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13/2020
Filing Date
03-01-2020
Registration No
13/2020
Registration Date
03-01-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MINESH KISHORBHAI SHAH
Adv. J V JANI
Respondent(s)
DIPEN JAGDISHBHAI THAKKAR Advocate - Y N MEHTA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE | |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a check that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 75,400 (with criminal maintenance of Rs. 208 per month), finding that all essential elements of the offense—check issuance for debt discharge, dishonor, notice delivery, and non-payment within 15 days—were proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a check that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 75,400 (with criminal maintenance of Rs. 208 per month), finding that all essential elements of the offense—check issuance for debt discharge, dishonor, notice delivery, and non-payment within 15 days—were proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts