LALJIBHAI PAMABHAI CHAMAR vs RAJPUT HANUBHAI GHELABHAI Advocate - B.D.GANESHIYA, B.D.GANESHIYA — 5/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 031,034,038. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMR060000052015
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2015
Filing Date
28-01-2015
Registration No
5/2015
Registration Date
28-01-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALVAD
Judge
33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LALJIBHAI PAMABHAI CHAMAR
Adv. V.C.JANI
Respondent(s)
RAJPUT HANUBHAI GHELABHAI Advocate - B.D.GANESHIYA, B.D.GANESHIYA
RAJPUT RUPABHAI BECHARBHAI(Legal Heir)
Adv. B.D.GANESHIYA
RAJPUT BANESHANGBHAI MANSANGBHAI
Adv. B.D.GANESHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 33-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 26-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 12-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS. 5/2015 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments regarding land ownership and dismissed key contentions in the cross-examination. The court found the plaintiff's claims regarding Plot No. 419 and the defendants' land holdings to be unsubstantiated, noting missing documentary evidence (revenue records, survey maps, ownership deeds). The case was adjourned with directions for further proceedings, and the plaintiff was directed to substantiate claims with proper land documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS. 5/2015 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments regarding land ownership and dismissed key contentions in the cross-examination. The court found the plaintiff's claims regarding Plot No. 419 and the defendants' land holdings to be unsubstantiated, noting missing documentary evidence (revenue records, survey maps, ownership deeds). The case was adjourned with directions for further proceedings, and the plaintiff was directed to substantiate claims with proper land documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts