STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAKESHBHAI VERSHIBHAI FULTARIYA Advocate - M V BARAIYA — 845/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR050010042025

Filing Number

845/2025

Filing Date

01-Oct-2025

Registration No

845/2025

Registration Date

01-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TANKARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11189006250853

Police Station

TANKARA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAKESHBHAI VERSHIBHAI FULTARIYA Advocate - M V BARAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the defendant under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) of all charges related to alleged illegal possession and sale of domestic liquor without proper permits. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with reliable witness testimony, as the panchnama (official record) lacked credible corroboration and the witnesses could not adequately support the prosecution's version of events. The defendant was ordered released from the benefit of doubt and acquitted, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  11. 01-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 01-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 845/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the defendant under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) of all charges related to alleged illegal possession and sale of domestic liquor without proper permits. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with reliable witness testimony, as the panchnama (official record) lacked credible corroboration and the witnesses could not adequately support the prosecution's version of events. The defendant was ordered released from the benefit of doubt and acquitted, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case