STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAKESHBHAI VERSHIBHAI FULTARIYA Advocate - M V BARAIYA — 845/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR050010042025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
845/2025
Filing Date
01-10-2025
Registration No
845/2025
Registration Date
01-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TANKARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11189006250853
Police Station
TANKARA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAKESHBHAI VERSHIBHAI FULTARIYA Advocate - M V BARAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 27-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 06-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 02-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the defendant under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) of all charges related to alleged illegal possession and sale of domestic liquor without proper permits. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with reliable witness testimony, as the panchnama (official record) lacked credible corroboration and the witnesses could not adequately support the prosecution's version of events. The defendant was ordered released from the benefit of doubt and acquitted, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the defendant under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) of all charges related to alleged illegal possession and sale of domestic liquor without proper permits. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with reliable witness testimony, as the panchnama (official record) lacked credible corroboration and the witnesses could not adequately support the prosecution's version of events. The defendant was ordered released from the benefit of doubt and acquitted, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts