Government of Gujarat vs LALBEN@ BHURIBEN W/o REMSINH BHURISINH DEHDIYA Advocate - M V BARAIYA — 165/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR050001962026

Filing Number

165/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

165/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, TANKARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11189006260175

Police Station

TANKARA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALBEN@ BHURIBEN W/o REMSINH BHURISINH DEHDIYA Advocate - M V BARAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused Lalben (also known as Bhuribenben) guilty under Section 65A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, and sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 100. The accused had voluntarily confessed to the crime, claiming it was her first offense and expressing remorse, which influenced the court's lenient sentence considering her poor economic background and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Lalben (also known as Bhuribenben) guilty under Section 65A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, and sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 100. The accused had voluntarily confessed to the crime, claiming it was her first offense and expressing remorse, which influenced the court's lenient sentence considering her poor economic background and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case