KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN vs MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA — 115/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR050001592025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
115/2025
Filing Date
17-02-2025
Registration No
115/2025
Registration Date
17-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TANKARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN
Adv. S J JOSHI
Respondent(s)
MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tankara, convicted defendant Manishbhai Amritlal Faikir under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of ₹10,00,000 to the complainant. The court found that the complainant had provided a loan to the defendant, who issued a cheque that was returned by the bank due to insufficient funds, and despite a legal notice, the defendant failed to make payment within 15 days. The court sentenced the defendant to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay compensation of ₹20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional three-month imprisonment if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tankara, convicted defendant Manishbhai Amritlal Faikir under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of ₹10,00,000 to the complainant. The court found that the complainant had provided a loan to the defendant, who issued a cheque that was returned by the bank due to insufficient funds, and despite a legal notice, the defendant failed to make payment within 15 days. The court sentenced the defendant to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay compensation of ₹20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional three-month imprisonment if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts