KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN vs MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA — 114/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR050001582025

Filing Number

114/2025

Filing Date

17-Feb-2025

Registration No

114/2025

Registration Date

17-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TANKARA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN

    Adv. S J JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Judgment Summary The court found the accused guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the accused's denial, the court determined that the complainant had established the case beyond reasonable doubt through documentary evidence, including the returned cheque memo and legal notice, while the accused failed to provide credible evidence supporting his defense. Decision: The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) as compensation at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if compensation is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  8. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  13. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  14. 03-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  15. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  16. 08-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  17. 04-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 17-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Judgment Summary The court found the accused guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the accused's denial, the court determined that the complainant had established the case beyond reasonable doubt through documentary evidence, including the returned cheque memo and legal notice, while the accused failed to provide credible evidence supporting his defense. Decision: The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) as compensation at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if compensation is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case