KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN vs MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA — 114/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR050001582025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

114/2025

Filing Date

17-02-2025

Registration No

114/2025

Registration Date

17-02-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, TANKARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01st May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN

Adv. S J JOSHI

Respondent(s)

MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

01-05-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT

Final Orders / Judgements

01-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Judgment Summary The court found the accused guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the accused's denial, the court determined that the complainant had established the case beyond reasonable doubt through documentary evidence, including the returned cheque memo and legal notice, while the accused failed to provide credible evidence supporting his defense. Decision: The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) as compensation at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if compensation is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Judgment Summary The court found the accused guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the accused's denial, the court determined that the complainant had established the case beyond reasonable doubt through documentary evidence, including the returned cheque memo and legal notice, while the accused failed to provide credible evidence supporting his defense. Decision: The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) as compensation at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if compensation is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, TANKARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case