KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN vs MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA — 114/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR050001582025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
114/2025
Filing Date
17-02-2025
Registration No
114/2025
Registration Date
17-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, TANKARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARMSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI PAN
Adv. S J JOSHI
Respondent(s)
MANISHBHAI AMRUTLAL FEFAR Advocate - M V BARAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgment Summary The court found the accused guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the accused's denial, the court determined that the complainant had established the case beyond reasonable doubt through documentary evidence, including the returned cheque memo and legal notice, while the accused failed to provide credible evidence supporting his defense. Decision: The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) as compensation at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if compensation is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Judgment Summary The court found the accused guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the accused's denial, the court determined that the complainant had established the case beyond reasonable doubt through documentary evidence, including the returned cheque memo and legal notice, while the accused failed to provide credible evidence supporting his defense. Decision: The accused was sentenced to 1 year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 20,00,000 (double the cheque amount) as compensation at 6% annual interest within 60 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if compensation is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts