Goverment of Gujarat vs HIRUBEN BHAGABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - M K VORA — 2956/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR040035482025
Filing Number
2956/2025
Filing Date
14-Nov-2025
Registration No
2956/2025
Registration Date
14-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, WANKANER
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1129
Police Station
WANKANER CITY POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Goverment of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIRUBEN BHAGABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - M K VORA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the accused Hiruben Bhagabhai Waghela of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the police witnesses' testimonies were not adequately corroborated by independent panchas (witnesses), and the recovered contraband lacked proper documentary support, resulting in insufficient evidence against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
04-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2956/2025
The court acquitted the accused Hiruben Bhagabhai Waghela of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the police witnesses' testimonies were not adequately corroborated by independent panchas (witnesses), and the recovered contraband lacked proper documentary support, resulting in insufficient evidence against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts