Goverment of Gujarat vs HIRUBEN BHAGABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - M K VORA — 2956/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR040035482025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2956/2025

Filing Date

14-11-2025

Registration No

2956/2025

Registration Date

14-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

1129

Police Station

WANKANER CITY POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

Goverment of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HIRUBEN BHAGABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - M K VORA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM

28-04-2026

Disposed

03-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

04-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused Hiruben Bhagabhai Waghela of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the police witnesses' testimonies were not adequately corroborated by independent panchas (witnesses), and the recovered contraband lacked proper documentary support, resulting in insufficient evidence against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Hiruben Bhagabhai Waghela of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the police witnesses' testimonies were not adequately corroborated by independent panchas (witnesses), and the recovered contraband lacked proper documentary support, resulting in insufficient evidence against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case