BECHARBHAI POPATBHAI DARDRA vs MARIYAMBEN MIMANJIBHAI MATHAKIYA Advocate - A Y SHAH — 45/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMR040018402017
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
45/2017
Filing Date
16-08-2016
Registration No
45/2017
Registration Date
16-08-2016
Court
TALUKA COURT, WANKANER
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BECHARBHAI POPATBHAI DARDRA
Adv. D.M.AGHARA
KHORAJIYA RAFIKBHAI
MADRESANIYA VALJI
YOGESH HARIBHAI
MAHEBUB MAMAD
BHORANIYA ABDUL ALI
MATHAKIYA VLIMAMD NURMAMD
MATHAKIYA VALLI AMI
MATHAKIYA YAKUB ALAUDI
KHORAJIYA NAJARUDIN
Respondent(s)
MARIYAMBEN MIMANJIBHAI MATHAKIYA Advocate - A Y SHAH
NURI MATHAKIYA
MAMAD MATHAKIYA
ASHI MATHAKIYA
HUSHEN MATHAKIYA
HUSHEN BADI
YUNUS BADI
JENU BADI
HALU BADI
JALAL BADI
ALAVDI BADI
AMINA BADI
HUSHEN BADI
RIYAT BADI
ZOHRA BADI
AEZAZ BADI
GULSHAN BADI
AJMINA BADI
HITESH ODEDRA
KAYANTILAL PIPALIYA
THE GUJRAT STATE
MAMLATDAR SHREE
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 29-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 01-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's case due to non-prosecution. The plaintiff failed to appear before the court and did not submit any application or objection in the last two hearings despite receiving notice. The court found that continuing the proceedings without the plaintiff's presence would serve no purpose and ordered the case to be dismissed based on the plaintiff's default and negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's case due to non-prosecution. The plaintiff failed to appear before the court and did not submit any application or objection in the last two hearings despite receiving notice. The court found that continuing the proceedings without the plaintiff's presence would serve no purpose and ordered the case to be dismissed based on the plaintiff's default and negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts