KANCHANBEN JAYESHBHAI JANGANI vs JAYESHBHAI VINODBHAI JANGANI Advocate - K B PARMAR — 52/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJMR040005952024
Filing Number
52/2024
Filing Date
17-Feb-2024
Registration No
52/2024
Registration Date
17-Feb-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, WANKANER
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANCHANBEN JAYESHBHAI JANGANI
Adv. A S JHALA
-
2.NIMISHABEN JAYESHBHAI JANGANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYESHBHAI VINODBHAI JANGANI Advocate - K B PARMAR
-
2.VINODBHAI CHAGANBHAI JANGANI
-
3.NIRUBEN VINODBHAI JANGANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary This is a CRMA (Criminal Misc. Application) No. 52/2024 from the Vadodara Additional Chief Judge's court in Gujarat, India. The court partially allowed the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered the respondent (husband's family) to pay monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 to the petitioner and ₹15,000 to a co-respondent, while rejecting claims for compensation and other relief due to insufficient evidence of domestic violence and the petitioner's voluntary separation from the household. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
06-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
21-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
09-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
17-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
28-May-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
09-May-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Appellant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Appellant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Appellant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Appellant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Dec-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
07-Oct-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
03-Aug-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
14-Jun-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
04-May-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2024
Summary This is a CRMA (Criminal Misc. Application) No. 52/2024 from the Vadodara Additional Chief Judge's court in Gujarat, India. The court partially allowed the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered the respondent (husband's family) to pay monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 to the petitioner and ₹15,000 to a co-respondent, while rejecting claims for compensation and other relief due to insufficient evidence of domestic violence and the petitioner's voluntary separation from the household. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts