KANCHANBEN JAYESHBHAI JANGANI vs JAYESHBHAI VINODBHAI JANGANI Advocate - K B PARMAR — 52/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJMR040005952024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
52/2024
Filing Date
17-02-2024
Registration No
52/2024
Registration Date
17-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, WANKANER
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANCHANBEN JAYESHBHAI JANGANI
Adv. A S JHALA
NIMISHABEN JAYESHBHAI JANGANI
Respondent(s)
JAYESHBHAI VINODBHAI JANGANI Advocate - K B PARMAR
VINODBHAI CHAGANBHAI JANGANI
NIRUBEN VINODBHAI JANGANI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 06-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 21-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary This is a CRMA (Criminal Misc. Application) No. 52/2024 from the Vadodara Additional Chief Judge's court in Gujarat, India. The court partially allowed the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered the respondent (husband's family) to pay monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 to the petitioner and ₹15,000 to a co-respondent, while rejecting claims for compensation and other relief due to insufficient evidence of domestic violence and the petitioner's voluntary separation from the household. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a CRMA (Criminal Misc. Application) No. 52/2024 from the Vadodara Additional Chief Judge's court in Gujarat, India. The court partially allowed the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered the respondent (husband's family) to pay monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 to the petitioner and ₹15,000 to a co-respondent, while rejecting claims for compensation and other relief due to insufficient evidence of domestic violence and the petitioner's voluntary separation from the household. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts