LABOUR OFFICER M P JOSHI vs PRADIPBHAI CHAGANBHAI DALSANIYA — 213/2026

Case under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 19(B),27(4). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR040002462026

Filing Number

213/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

213/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 19(B),27(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LABOUR OFFICER M P JOSHI

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADIPBHAI CHAGANBHAI DALSANIYA

  2. 2.RAINBO FEBPACK L.L.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty of violating Sections 27(4) and 19(b) of the Bonus Payment Act, 1965, and Gujarat Bonus Payment Rules, 1975, for failing to maintain and submit required bonus records and accounts for the financial year 2023-24. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) and ₹2,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) respectively, while acquitting them on one charge under Section 26 of the Act due to insufficient evidence of voluntary and genuine confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 213/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty of violating Sections 27(4) and 19(b) of the Bonus Payment Act, 1965, and Gujarat Bonus Payment Rules, 1975, for failing to maintain and submit required bonus records and accounts for the financial year 2023-24. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) and ₹2,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) respectively, while acquitting them on one charge under Section 26 of the Act due to insufficient evidence of voluntary and genuine confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case