LABOUR OFFICER M P JOSHI vs PRADIPBHAI CHAGANBHAI DALSANIYA — 212/2026

Case under The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR040002452026

Filing Number

212/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, WANKANER

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LABOUR OFFICER M P JOSHI

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADIPBHAI CHAGANBHAI DALSANIYA

  2. 2.RAINBO FEBPACK L.L.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found that the respondent organization violated the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 and Rules, 1976 by failing to maintain proper records and registers of employees as required under Rule 6 read with Section 8. The court convicted the accused and imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000 with an alternative simple imprisonment of 10 days, holding that the organization's failure to produce required employment documentation constituted a violation of statutory obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found that the respondent organization violated the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 and Rules, 1976 by failing to maintain proper records and registers of employees as required under Rule 6 read with Section 8. The court convicted the accused and imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000 with an alternative simple imprisonment of 10 days, holding that the organization's failure to produce required employment documentation constituted a violation of statutory obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case