AMBATAR NURMAMAD YAKUBBHAI(Legal Heir) vs SANGHVI RAJESHBHAI MANHARLAL Advocate - G L DABHI — 304/2007
Case under Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 93. Status: HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMR040001662007
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
304/2007
Filing Date
18-12-2007
Registration No
304/2007
Registration Date
18-12-2007
Court
TALUKA COURT, WANKANER
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMBATAR NURMAMAD YAKUBBHAI(Legal Heir)
Adv. M F BLOCH1.
AMBATAR HALIMABEN NURMAMAD
Adv. A S GADHIA1.
AMBATAR MAHMADSHABBIR NURMAMAD
Adv. A S GADHIA1.
AMBATAR JAVEDBHAI NURMAMAD
Adv. A S GADHIA
Respondent(s)
SANGHVI RAJESHBHAI MANHARLAL Advocate - G L DABHI
DOSHI JASHMIN BHARATKUMAR
Adv. G L DABHI
PRAVINBHAI CHANDULAL PATEL
PATEL MAVJIBHAI NAGJIBHAI
PRAVINBHAI RAMJIBHAI BHALODIYA
PRABHUBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI CHANIYARA
BHAVANBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI CHANIYARA
PROTEX CERAMIC PVT. LTD. COMPANY(Legal Heir)
REVENZA CERAMIC(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. CJM
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. | |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. | |
| 22-01-2026 | HEARING ON INTERIM APPLI. |
Interim Orders
The plaintiff's case for dismissal and withdrawal is dismissed for default under CPC Order-9, Rule-3 due to the plaintiff's repeated non-appearance and failure to file evidence despite being given multiple opportunities. The court found that the plaintiff showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case and therefore dismissed it on 21 December 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The plaintiff's case for dismissal and withdrawal is dismissed for default under CPC Order-9, Rule-3 due to the plaintiff's repeated non-appearance and failure to file evidence despite being given multiple opportunities. The court found that the plaintiff showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case and therefore dismissed it on 21 December 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts