M P JOSHI - GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER vs AGILIS VITRIFIED PVT LTD — 10780/2025

Case under The Inter-state Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020131022025

Filing Number

10780/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

10780/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Inter-state Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M P JOSHI - GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AGILIS VITRIFIED PVT LTD

  2. 2.YUVRAJ PRANJIVANBHAI BHADANIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979 and Gujarat Rules, 1981, finding violations of labor law provisions. However, considering the accused's admission of guilt, first-time offender status, poor financial condition, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹1,000 with two days simple imprisonment in default, emphasizing the reformative purpose of law rather than mere punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10780/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979 and Gujarat Rules, 1981, finding violations of labor law provisions. However, considering the accused's admission of guilt, first-time offender status, poor financial condition, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹1,000 with two days simple imprisonment in default, emphasizing the reformative purpose of law rather than mere punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case