R G CHAUDHRI GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER vs JIGARBHAI VASANTBHAI BHILA Advocate - Y D PATEL — 10770/2025

Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 33(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020130862025

Filing Number

10770/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

10770/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Factories Act, 1948 Section 33(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R G CHAUDHRI GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JIGARBHAI VASANTBHAI BHILA Advocate - Y D PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 33(1) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1878, sentencing them to imprisonment until the court's rising plus a fine of ₹25,000, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused guilty, considering mitigating factors such as their poor financial condition, family responsibility, and first-time offence, while emphasizing the reformative purpose of criminal law alongside punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10770/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 33(1) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1878, sentencing them to imprisonment until the court's rising plus a fine of ₹25,000, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused guilty, considering mitigating factors such as their poor financial condition, family responsibility, and first-time offence, while emphasizing the reformative purpose of criminal law alongside punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case