PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD - NAYAB IJNER - SANJAYBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI AMRUTIYA vs VINODBHAI KANJIBHAI HAMIRPARA — 33/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21.1,21.10,21.11(A),21.12,21.21,21.22(2). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJMR020130512025

Filing Number

33/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

19-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21.1,21.10,21.11(A),21.12,21.21,21.22(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD - NAYAB IJNER - SANJAYBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI AMRUTIYA

    Adv. H D GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINODBHAI KANJIBHAI HAMIRPARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court decided that the defendant (execution debtor) has received the full amount owed under the decree, and therefore the execution petition should be dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for execution proceedings, ruling that since the debt obligation has been fully satisfied, no further recovery action is warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court decided that the defendant (execution debtor) has received the full amount owed under the decree, and therefore the execution petition should be dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for execution proceedings, ruling that since the debt obligation has been fully satisfied, no further recovery action is warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case