Government of Gujarat vs JAYESHBHAI RAJUBHAI VASVELIYA — 10682/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020129222025

Filing Number

10682/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

10682/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2571

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.JAYESHBHAI RAJUBHAI VASVELIYA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order

The Gujarat High Court reduced the accused's sentence in a reckless driving case where he had pleaded guilty. The court found that the trial judge failed to consider extenuating circumstances (accused's impoverished background, family responsibilities, and first-time offence) and modified the sentence to a fine of Rs. 500 instead of imprisonment, citing relevant precedent and principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
10-Mar-2026

Order

2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
28-Feb-2026

Process To Accused

2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
15-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
15-Dec-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 10682/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court reduced the accused's sentence in a reckless driving case where he had pleaded guilty. The court found that the trial judge failed to consider extenuating circumstances (accused's impoverished background, family responsibilities, and first-time offence) and modified the sentence to a fine of Rs. 500 instead of imprisonment, citing relevant precedent and principles of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.