KRISHNA COLOUR CHEM - PARESHBHAI ANANTRAI BOSAMIYA C.A.18000000 vs LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED — 9874/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020120932025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

9874/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

9874/2025

Registration Date

10-12-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

KRISHNA COLOUR CHEM - PARESHBHAI ANANTRAI BOSAMIYA C.A.18000000

Adv. C D KARIYA

Respondent(s)

LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED

HITESH BABULAL DETROJA - LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LTD.

DIMPALBEN ANILBHAI DETROJA -LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED

ANILKUMAR BABULAL DETROJA DIRECTOR OF LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED

JITENDRABHAI CHANDULAL LAKHTARIYA - LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED

CHIRAG MUKESHBHAI HIRANI -LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED

UMANGKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI JAGODANA - LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: 7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

LOK ADALAT

27-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

17-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary In Civil Case No. 9874/2025, the court decided that the defendant's Video Purchase Order No. 08 was wrongly rejected, and the defendant is entitled to proper compensation for the work completed. The court held that since the work was properly executed and no further work is pending, the defendant should be awarded fees/compensation from the Video Purchase Order. The judgment was dated 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Case No. 9874/2025, the court decided that the defendant's Video Purchase Order No. 08 was wrongly rejected, and the defendant is entitled to proper compensation for the work completed. The court held that since the work was properly executed and no further work is pending, the defendant should be awarded fees/compensation from the Video Purchase Order. The judgment was dated 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case