KRISHNA COLOUR CHEM - PARESHBHAI ANANTRAI BOSAMIYA C.A.18000000 vs LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED — 9874/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020120932025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9874/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
9874/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRISHNA COLOUR CHEM - PARESHBHAI ANANTRAI BOSAMIYA C.A.18000000
Adv. C D KARIYA
Respondent(s)
LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED
HITESH BABULAL DETROJA - LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LTD.
DIMPALBEN ANILBHAI DETROJA -LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED
ANILKUMAR BABULAL DETROJA DIRECTOR OF LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED
JITENDRABHAI CHANDULAL LAKHTARIYA - LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED
CHIRAG MUKESHBHAI HIRANI -LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED
UMANGKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI JAGODANA - LEXUS GRANITO INDIA LIMITED
Hearing History
Judge: 7-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 27-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 17-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In Civil Case No. 9874/2025, the court decided that the defendant's Video Purchase Order No. 08 was wrongly rejected, and the defendant is entitled to proper compensation for the work completed. The court held that since the work was properly executed and no further work is pending, the defendant should be awarded fees/compensation from the Video Purchase Order. The judgment was dated 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Civil Case No. 9874/2025, the court decided that the defendant's Video Purchase Order No. 08 was wrongly rejected, and the defendant is entitled to proper compensation for the work completed. The court held that since the work was properly executed and no further work is pending, the defendant should be awarded fees/compensation from the Video Purchase Order. The judgment was dated 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts